| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 7 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M4A88T-V EVO/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20101215 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 21 '17 at 17:44 |
| Run Duration | 87 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Single core | Quad core | Multi core |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59%
Above average
|
66% 82 Pts
|
73% 321 Pts
|
49% 322 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
79.2%
Very good
|
81% 230 fps
|
60% 158 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
37.5%
Below average
|
32% 146 MB/s
|
70% 25.5 MB/s
|
16% 29.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
|
31.7%
Below average
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
22% 7.77 GB/s
|
60% 66.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Typical M4A88T-V EVO/USB3 Builds (Compare 234 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A88T-V EVO/USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $140Bench 42%, 9,542 samples | 57x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 45%, 11,543 samples | 31x |
| Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 49%, 3,032 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 1,282 samples | 16x |
| HD 5770AMDBench 13%, 9,589 samples | 12x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 38%, 22,175 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 51% - Above average | Total price: $199 |