Asus X79-DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 118% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X79-DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160202
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 20 '17 at 16:35
Run Duration	315 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189 5,121 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 94.2 1-Core 100 2-Core 200 77% 131 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 674 70% 561 Pts	64-Core 840 52% 840 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp 8,552 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2950 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	130% Outstanding	Lighting 173 Reflection 215 Parallax 219 141% 202 fps	MRender 139 Gravity 208 Splatting 138 131% 162 fps
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 140%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550 8,641 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 286GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01F0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	147% Outstanding	Read 1,585 Write 856 Mixed 1,160 265% 1,201 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 61.5 4K Mixed 16.9 84% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 59.1 70% 122 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 230%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 149GB free Firmware: 6B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 17237 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4931 (B1) Unknown 93 93 227 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 54 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1541 (F1) Unknown 99 99 65951365298	58.6% Above average	Read 269 Write 256 Mixed 264 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 21.3 89% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 66.1 DQ Mixed 73 66% 102 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 116%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 196 192 9158 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12240 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10824 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3065 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1030 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 191 191 28846 (C2) HDA temperature 114 103 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	76.3% Very good	Read 142 Write 124 Mixed 99 91% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.27 89% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 99%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2TB free Firmware: JKAO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 77 77 1160 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 109 (03) Spinup time 162 162 51567133143 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 8291 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 112 112 39 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 29244 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5324 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 8959 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 8959 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 279173988390 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 35% Great: 69%
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB 1,184 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 207 182 8616 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4329 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8172 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2160 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 629 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3699 (C2) HDA temperature 115 99 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	54% Above average	Read 104 Write 84.3 Mixed 78.8 67% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.22 81% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 100%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB 7,087 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1.5TB free Firmware: 5G05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 164 139 8783 (04) Start/Stop count 78 78 22744 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 31153 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6922 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1810 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 115 115 256657 (C2) HDA temperature 109 95 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 141728 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71.3% Very good	Read 150 Write 98 Mixed 101 87% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.4 121% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 63%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB 2,807 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1TB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 137 9950 (04) Start/Stop count 77 77 23015 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 1 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 28620 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6907 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 2045 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 160 160 121686 (C2) HDA temperature 113 94 39 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	47.5% Average	Read 88.1 Write 77.3 Mixed 80 62% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.19 65% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 72%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 424GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 186 177 7691 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13447 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15700 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4031 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1855 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 179 179 64851 (C2) HDA temperature 111 102 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	53.6% Above average	Read 103 Write 83.8 Mixed 78.6 66% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.2 89% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 100%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB 7,087 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 52GB free Firmware: 04.05G05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 140 8633 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11252 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 31391 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7334 (C0) Power-off retract count 196 196 3241 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 102 102 295614 (C2) HDA temperature 110 88 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	33% Below average	Read 60.9 Write 53.5 Mixed 50 41% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.32 98% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB 5,910 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 50.7 MC Write 39.4 MC Mixed 49.1 133% 46.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 13.2 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79-DELUXE Builds (Compare 533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 96%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 84%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X79-DELUXE - $229

CPU
Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	236x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	97x
Core i7-4960XIntel $1,189Bench 78%, 5,121 samples	66x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	30x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	26x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	15x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 5,910 samples	21x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	17x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $884

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16