Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '17 at 09:36
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 283
97% 174 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 782
78% 636 Pts
64-Core 794
49% 794 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2087 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.65
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 484
Write 240
Mixed 299
75% 341 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 13.9
98% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 34.2
72% 147 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 95%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
82GB free
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 473
Write 340
Mixed 340
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 24.7
119% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 45.9
94% 192 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87%
Great: 99%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
52GB free
Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 486
Write 340
Mixed 340
86% 389 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 24.5
119% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 40.1
53% 89.9 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 99%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
32GB free
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 484
Write 317
Mixed 297
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 25
119% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 43.2
54% 90.7 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 27.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 27.2
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 52.3
76% 52.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 801 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $900
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback