Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160613
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '17 at 20:57
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.20GHz 680 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	49% Average	Memory 71.6 1-Core 63.3 2-Core 72.3 46% 69.1 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 288 26% 216 Pts	64-Core 659 41% 659 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088 6,806 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Nvidia(10DE 1035) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44% Average	Lighting 52.9 Reflection 53.2 Parallax 66.4 43% 57.5 fps	MRender 66.1 Gravity 58.3 Splatting 47.3 46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31 9,202 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 751 Write 584 Mixed 708 152% 681 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 17.7 97% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 440 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 109 147% 273 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 243%
Seagate ST3250823AS 250GB-$99 5,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 137GB free Firmware: 3.03 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 49 46 167652624 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1473 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 90 60 982737405 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 15775 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 875 (C2) HDA temperature 37 63 64424509477 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 49 46 167652624 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 196 39 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	34.2% Below average	Read 60 Write 59.1 Mixed 54.8 44% 58 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.33 76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 37%
170 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 113GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 41.6 Write 20.3 Mixed 13.8 28% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.11 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.69 83% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB 4,583 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 55.3 MC Write 36.3 MC Mixed 40.1 125% 43.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 10 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 97.7 41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 801 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	425x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	116x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	51x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	48x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	23x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	20x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16