Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1202 x 662 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '17 at 09:52
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 457
61% 458 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841E) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 39.4
27% 34.5 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 26.3
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.1% Good
Read 277
Write 185
Mixed 222
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 35.5
118% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 91.8
DQ Mixed 55.1
56% 91.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
526GB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 151
Write 144
Mixed 142
110% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.3
86% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
597GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 111
Write 116
Mixed 116
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 3.12
4K Mixed 0.29
134% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 112%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
936GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 24.1
Mixed 26
33% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.32
53% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 71%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
273GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 23.7
Mixed 24.2
32% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.23
72% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15%
Great: 59%
Seagate Desktop 500GB
120GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 24
Mixed 16.4
28% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.49
72% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.9% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 Builds (Compare 1,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,003
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback