Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170322
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '17 at 23:38
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Memory 96.1 1-Core 146 2-Core 263 95% 169 Pts	4-Core 498 8-Core 816 80% 657 Pts	64-Core 816 50% 816 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 117 Parallax 98.9 89% 109 fps	MRender 99.2 Gravity 103 Splatting 98.6 82% 100 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 353GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	280% Outstanding	Read 2,743 Write 1,360 Mixed 1,401 403% 1,835 MB/s	4K Read 63 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 32.8 218% 82.7 MB/s	DQ Read 631 DQ Write 473 DQ Mixed 31.8 165% 379 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 280% Great: 254%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 119GB free Firmware: 0006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1260 (05) Reallocated sector count 98 98 481280 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13849 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2645 (AA) Unknown 98 98 235 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 202 202 7749 (AE) Unknown 100 100 5 (B5) Unknown 100 100 14628752263096 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 225 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 34122 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 235 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 45 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 202 202 154 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	58.6% Above average	Read 351 Write 143 Mixed 170 48% 221 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 96 4K Mixed 2.57 104% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 2.84 48% 116 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 386GB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 200629728 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 3005 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 60 60 158949276506 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6472 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1667 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BE) vendor-specific 74 29 7143035502618 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 185 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 70 70 60424 (C2) HDA temperature 26 71 73014444058 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -26718991544967 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1653144891942 (F2) Unknown 100 253 10650828459467	88.1% Excellent	Read 150 Write 158 Mixed 103 102% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.04 4K Mixed 0.28 81% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 113%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 15GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 76.3 Write 23.8 Mixed 18 39% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.93 4K Write 0.12 4K Mixed 0.12 30% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 2x8GB 4,420 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	MC Read 36.6 MC Write 37.7 MC Mixed 31.1 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 38.8 SC Mixed 31.5 88% 30.8 GB/s	Latency 53.5 75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,072 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	3,895x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	764x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	363x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	905x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	783x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	778x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	267x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	266x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	196x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	355x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	288x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,224

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16