Asus N53Jf

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 98% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus N53Jf (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N53Jf
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101001
Uptime	6.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '17 at 10:18
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	98%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	45.5% Average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 61.4 2-Core 106 47% 76.9 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 160 22% 161 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M 3,013 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1532) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7892 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.64% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 3.85 Parallax 1.75 2% 2.9 fps	MRender 4.95 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 2.48 3% 3.64 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.64% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7772 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 157 (B1) Unknown 97 97 56 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 30 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 22 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20141228574	55.6% Above average	Read 246 Write 190 Mixed 194 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 22.7 4K Mixed 28.4 88% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 76.8 76% 122 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 124%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB 18,744 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 419GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 26.1 Write 21.8 Mixed 22.7 30% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.2 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 42%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 28GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 24.9 Write 10.7 Mixed 12.4 18% 16 MB/s	4K Read 3.76 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.66 83% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 38%
USB Disk 32GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	9.07% Terrible	Read 17.6 Write 11.9 Mixed 13.9 18% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.35 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.83 76% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.07% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GB 1,533 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 11.1 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N53Jf Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N53Jf

CPU
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	19x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	12x
Core i5 M 450IntelBench 40%, 8,084 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	25x
GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
SD720 256GBTranscendBench 74%, 312 samples	2x
U100 252GBSandiskBench 35%, 177 samples	2x

RAM
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 2x2GBAsintBench 27%, 888 samples	13x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 1,533 samples	4x
99U5428-040.A01LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 421 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16