Lenovo 423323G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 423323G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO KIWDX
Memory0.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080922
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '17 at 13:51
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T3200
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Memory 38.3
1-Core 14.7
2-Core 25.4
19% 26.1 Pts
4-Core 31
8-Core 33.3
4% 32.2 Pts
64-Core 38.1
2% 38.1 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 45 Express Chipset Family
Legend(17AA 3A02) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.26% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.33 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.43
0% 0.34 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.26%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 192
Write 67.7
Mixed 106
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 6.28
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 6.26
26% 9.37 MB/s
DQ Read 46.6
DQ Write 50.8
DQ Mixed 18.2
22% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
8.48% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.87 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 1
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.48%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback