Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateApr 15 '17 at 02:46
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 270
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 765
76% 617 Pts
64-Core 788
49% 788 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Gigabyte(1458 3628) 3GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Lighting 72.7
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 87.9
59% 76.3 fps
MRender 80
Gravity 80.5
Splatting 51.6
56% 70.7 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
210GB free
Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 523
Write 500
Mixed 514
115% 513 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 47.1
184% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 27.8
106% 235 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 123%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 478
Write 134
Mixed 190
58% 268 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 12.2
108% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 26.7
76% 167 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
2TB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 155
Write 135
Mixed 120
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.27
86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
2TB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 153
Write 153
Mixed 115
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.26
82% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 105%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 72.1
Write 88.4
Mixed 111
69% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.23
86% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
927GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 62.7
Mixed 67.6
50% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.22
68% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 20.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,108
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback