Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	86.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds)
Memory	57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '17 at 01:37
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 546 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 75.6 2-Core 150 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 603 53% 451 Pts	64-Core 1384 86% 1384 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 120 Parallax 110 89% 113 fps	MRender 98.7 Gravity 104 Splatting 97.9 82% 100 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 355GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 1,515 Write 1,249 Mixed 1,370 307% 1,378 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 97.5 4K Mixed 46.9 176% 62.2 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 96.6 101% 168 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 353%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 340GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8723 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1464 (B1) Unknown 98 98 49 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 53 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 97 (F1) Unknown 99 99 27212370731
Poor: 66% Great: 118%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 176 7866 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1892 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4368 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 340 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 94 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10170 (C2) HDA temperature 119 105 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 335 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	91.3% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 156 Mixed 142 115% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.31 107% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 83%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 770GB free Firmware: 9300 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 100 46098764 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 45 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 61 60 8592845602 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -59081570123526 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 53 588513313 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 227 (C2) HDA temperature 33 47 77309411361 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -86878598463467 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6668684295 (F2) Unknown 100 253 72570437	42.1% Average	Read 71.4 Write 73.8 Mixed 52.6 49% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.39 4K Mixed 0.45 200% 2.35 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 65%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 564GB free Firmware: 9300 Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 60.6 Write 67.2 Mixed 56.2 46% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 5.93 4K Mixed 0.47 199% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 4x16GB 763 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 1600 MHz clocked @ 1667 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	MC Read 37.2 MC Write 35.4 MC Mixed 31.5 99% 34.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 16.3 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 87.6 46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	200x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	170x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	177x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	64x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	42x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	40x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	18x
CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 32GBCorsairBench 134%, 17 samples	16x
CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- 32GBCorsairBench 127%, 15 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,076

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)