MSI MS-7211

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 6% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	MSI MS-7211 (all builds)
Memory	0.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	19060609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '17 at 22:38
Run Duration	385 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz 3,782 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	28.7% Poor	Memory 49.9 1-Core 23.3 2-Core 45.6 27% 39.6 Pts	4-Core 46 8-Core 45.8 6% 45.9 Pts	64-Core 45.8 3% 45.8 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6600 968 User benchmarks, average bench 0% MSI(1462 9890) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 307.83 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.2% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 0.54 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.37 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.2% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85 5,008 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: WU100-33 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6144 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 959 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10356 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 525 (BE) vendor-specific 106 37 44 (C2) HDA temperature 106 37 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 2622687 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	26.2% Poor	Read 42.2 Write 49 Mixed 35.8 32% 42.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.08 4K Write 0.55 4K Mixed 0.11 25% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 33%
Seagate ST3120022A 120GB-$143 933 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 40GB free Firmware: 8.76 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 66 60 163979102 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1160 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 272635287 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5892 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 5044 (C2) HDA temperature 48 66 48 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 66 60 163979102 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 3 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 190 52 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	17.5% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 34.6 Mixed 19.8 20% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.29 67% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 31%
Maxtor 4D040H2 41GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1GB free Firmware: DAH017K0 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 232 228 5576 (04) Start/Stop count 250 250 6766 (05) Reallocated sector count 156 156 245 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 251 232 50233 (09) Power-on hours count 244 244 1879 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 246 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 237 237 6637 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 111 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 250 249 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 199 0 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 247 40 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 252 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 247 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 253 253 0 (63) Unknown 253 253 0 (64) Unknown 253 253 0 (65) Unknown 253 253 0	6.18% Terrible	Read 13 Write 8.31 Mixed 9.85 8% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.24 4K Write 0.58 4K Mixed 0.2 43% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.18% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x0.5GB 3,675 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 2 of 2 slots used 1GB DIMM Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.81% Terrible	MC Read 2.4 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2 6% 2.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 0.1 5% 1.77 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.81% Great: 15%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI MS-7211

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)