Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P6X58D-E (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '17 at 21:11
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 970-$1,141 4,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 94.2 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 168 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 531 53% 433 Pts	64-Core 650 40% 650 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350 22,303 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gainward(10B0 0401) 1.2GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Lighting 27 Reflection 40.6 Parallax 34 22% 33.9 fps	MRender 40.3 Gravity 22 Splatting 27.7 24% 30 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1764 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1087 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 61 22 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 25 (EB) Unknown 99 99 993 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3982825358	70% Very good	Read 270 Write 216 Mixed 142 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 34.7 123% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 75.6 86% 147 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 134%
Marvell Raid VD 0 499GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 398GB free (System drive) Firmware: MV.R Max speed: n/a Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	59.2% Above average	Read 387 Write 245 Mixed 302 69% 311 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 23.7 85% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 65.2 DQ Write 41.7 DQ Mixed 35.6 31% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 61%
Corsair Force 120GB 1,958 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 112GB free Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 2633316 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -95459943102799 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2558 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 71 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 21 50 38657982485 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 99 99 2633316 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9728 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11648 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11648 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23168	41.3% Average	Read 215 Write 108 Mixed 120 32% 148 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 11.1 74% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 32 45% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 56%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 126GB 365 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 117GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 123 Write 28.8 Mixed 11.2 48% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.89 79% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	45.8% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 19 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 10.2 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	496x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	198x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	145x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	74x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	74x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	68x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	47x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	231x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	221x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	132x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16