Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '17 at 11:26
Run Duration	327 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	81%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 69.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 170 65% 114 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 595 51% 436 Pts	64-Core 819 51% 819 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% PowerColor(148C 2336) 2GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.2% Poor	Lighting 30.7 Reflection 28.9 Parallax 28.2 25% 29.3 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 20 Splatting 33.7 23% 26.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 40GB 1,808 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102HB Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 423 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 396 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 128 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 43830 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 986 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 638133772 (E8) Unknown 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	28.6% Poor	Read 184 Write 42.1 Mixed 68.2 21% 98 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 39.4 4K Mixed 7.08 57% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 72.5 DQ Write 41.9 DQ Mixed 3.08 17% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 36%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 8GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	7.21% Terrible	Read 22 Write 3.22 Mixed 4.81 9% 9.99 MB/s	4K Read 4.12 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.73 66% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.21% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C 2x8GB 755 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	MC Read 34.6 MC Write 33.6 MC Mixed 30.8 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 25.3 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	19x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $516

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16