Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion AY602AA-ABA HPE-140f (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100625
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '17 at 02:14
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Memory 69.3 1-Core 80.6 2-Core 154 59% 101 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 211 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 1972) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 68.6 Reflection 71.7 Parallax 64.5 56% 68.3 fps	MRender 73.9 Gravity 64.1 Splatting 59.6 53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63 12,393 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 931 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 421 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 113 (AD) Unknown 100 100 786469 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 57 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1247	17.7% Very poor	Read 260 Write 43.1 Mixed 52.4 25% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.15 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 0.36 14% 7.85 MB/s	DQ Read 0.58 DQ Write 41.5 DQ Mixed 20.1 16% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 91%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB 352 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 56GB free, PID fa05 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.32% Terrible	Read 28.2 Write 19.7 Mixed 16.1 25% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.83 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.009 15% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.32% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80CE80 M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GB 417 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.1% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 14.2 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	1x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1x

SSD
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $145Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBCE80CE80Bench 39%, 417 samples	1x
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 12GBFE02FE02Bench 34%, 8 samples	1x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $215

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16