Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Extreme  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 11 '17 at 17:01
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 162
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 474
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 63.3
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 60.2
52% 63.8 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 54
50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 457
Write 395
Mixed 374
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 29.9
107% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 83.9
85% 137 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 104%
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
21GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 492
Write 320
Mixed 284
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 9.68
69% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 42.6
58% 106 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 107
Write 111
Mixed 73
72% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.21
99% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST925032 0AS 250GB
158GB free
Firmware: 0303 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 59.7
Write 42.7
Mixed 21.4
30% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.19
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.33
63% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 39%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
14GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 78.9
Write 69
Mixed 57.3
51% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.14
61% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 19.5
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Extreme Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $777
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback