Asus N550JK

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus N550JK (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N550JK
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140926
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '17 at 15:50
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710HQ 69,536 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 85.2 1-Core 104 2-Core 209 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 550 59% 470 Pts	64-Core 529 33% 529 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M 13,931 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 11CD) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8165 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 20.7 Reflection 15.8 Parallax 17.1 17% 17.9 fps	MRender 13.7 Gravity 21.6 Splatting 15.4 14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2699 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1564 (B1) Unknown 98 98 24 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 55 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 71 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13048876099	112% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 404 Mixed 415 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 87.4 4K Mixed 45.9 173% 59.5 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 107 135% 242 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 698GB free Firmware: AX0R2J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1714 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 5853 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 3069 (0A) Spinup retry count 216 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2043 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 27 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 270 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 29239 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 167504183320 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 96 96 1601 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 264 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	48.1% Average	Read 88.7 Write 79 Mixed 74.2 60% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.15 50% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 62%
Seagate D3 Station 2TB 143 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 324GB free, PID 6123 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 128 Write 128 Mixed 83.5 142% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.23 64% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 77%
HGST 1TB 1,195 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 102GB free, PID 1014 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 38.1 Mixed 27.6 44% 34.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.18 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMSO8GX3M1C1600C11 Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 16.5 56% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 19 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N550JK Builds (Compare 819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N550JK

CPU
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	526x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	274x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	17x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	552x
GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples	267x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
X110 256GBSanDisk $100Bench 79%, 4,989 samples	22x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	232x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	103x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GBSamsungBench 41%, 874 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $450

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16