Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 10 '17 at 17:45
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 585
77% 578 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.4.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 80.9
53% 71.6 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 56
50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 2,383
Write 1,185
Mixed 1,372
362% 1,646 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 42
188% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 96.5
114% 195 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 235%
Great: 236%
OCZ Trion 100 480GB-$139
120GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 486
Write 266
Mixed 275
75% 342 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 7.66
73% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 36.4
70% 142 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 90%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
227GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 153
Write 137
Mixed 135
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.54
151% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 23.9
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 23.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 56.9
70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback