HP 18-1200br

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 18-1200br  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B00
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20130306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '17 at 18:25
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Memory 47
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 35.7
24% 33.7 Pts
4-Core 32.4
8-Core 34.8
4% 33.6 Pts
64-Core 36.5
2% 36.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
HP(103C 2B00) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.100.0.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 1.34
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 438
Write 243
Mixed 252
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 6.97
39% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 74.8
DQ Write 27.1
DQ Mixed 14.5
20% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.4
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback