Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141002
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '17 at 21:24
Run Duration	451 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 79.1 1-Core 65.8 2-Core 124 55% 89.7 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 202 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290 24,657 User benchmarks, average bench 19% XFX(1682 3126) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Lighting 18.5 Reflection 13.6 Parallax 15 15% 15.7 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 13.5 Splatting 17.4 12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 456GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 159 Mixed 157 123% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.18 72% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 148GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 55.2 Write 9.18 Mixed 15.6 20% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.19 4K Mixed 0.16 39% 0.26 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 36%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 327 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 63GB free, PID a008 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 39%
Intenso Alu Line 16GB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	3.03% Terrible	Read 13.1 Write 4.29 Mixed 6.24 8% 7.88 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.006 3% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.03% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-003.A00LF 12GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	MC Read 16 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 13.8 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 11.6 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68-GS4/USB3 FX Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	12x
FX-8320EAMD $87Bench 58%, 33,199 samples	8x
FX-4130 Quad-CoreAMD $150Bench 52%, 8,564 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	4x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
Sata II 127GBIntensoBench 62%, 1 sample	3x
A S340 240GBApacerBench 54%, 75 samples	2x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	6x
9905403-02X.B00LF 2x4GBHynixBench 47%, 25 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16