Acer Aspire M5811

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Aspire M5811 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer H57M01
Memory	2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100429
Uptime	10.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '17 at 07:59
Run Duration	551 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 140 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 259 35% 260 Pts	64-Core 267 16% 267 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.6% Below average	Lighting 45.2 Reflection 42.1 Parallax 37.3 37% 41.5 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 34 30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12588 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 284 (B1) Unknown 90 90 192 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 41 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 77 (F1) Unknown 99 99 78826149879	60.5% Good	Read 265 Write 209 Mixed 119 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 28.2 96% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 86.8 86% 138 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 168 4466 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 971 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2244 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 22 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 13 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 14352 (C2) HDA temperature 124 115 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.1% Good	Read 106 Write 104 Mixed 48.3 63% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 0.41 4K Mixed 0.26 61% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 513GB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 79 240905752 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2015 (05) Reallocated sector count 98 98 2632 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 46656943 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 35801 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 418 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 1922 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 62 62 38 (BE) vendor-specific 75 46 520880153 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 207 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 69 69 63866 (C2) HDA temperature 25 54 42949672985 (C5) Current pending sector count 99 92 240 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 99 92 240 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 123690763189146 (F1) Unknown 100 253 62207202373170 (F2) Unknown 100 253 96176420221831
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1TB 946 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 840GB free, PID 0b1a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 25.2 Mixed 8.28 25% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.2 19% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 43%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB 3,704 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 435GB free, PID 1110 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 22.9 Mixed 25.5 32% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.16 52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 20%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-22A0RT0 500GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 103GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 28 Write 22.3 Mixed 12 24% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.21 54% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 17%
SAMSUNG HM320JI 320GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 72GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 28.4 Write 24.5 Mixed 24.5 33% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.34 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 17%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 32GB 1,099 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 15GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	8.15% Terrible	Read 19.9 Write 6.6 Mixed 6.18 11% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.09 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.38 58% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.15% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KLU-2G 3x2GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	35.5% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10.6 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9.8 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M5811 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5811

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	43x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	37x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	33x

GPU
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	7x

SSD
530 Series 120GBIntel $79Bench 67%, 15,015 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 3x2GBToshibaBench 31%, 210 samples	10x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 4x2GBToshibaBench 34%, 148 samples	9x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $151

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16