Samsung 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Samsung 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 305E4A/305E4A
Memory	7.9 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '17 at 23:51
Run Duration	108 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3305M APU 1,486 User benchmarks, average bench 31% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 54.9 1-Core 32.3 2-Core 60.5 32% 49.2 Pts	4-Core 57.6 8-Core 59.8 8% 58.7 Pts	64-Core 60 4% 60 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6480G 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C624) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	1.07% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 1.62 Parallax 0.88 1% 1.21 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 2.22 1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.07% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 89051851923809 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1653 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 572 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 38 49 42952884262 (C2) HDA temperature 38 49 42952884262 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4818 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2464 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2464 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2543	24.1% Poor	Read 146 Write 109 Mixed 124 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 9.22 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 6.77 35% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.6 DQ Write 35.6 DQ Mixed 5.69 10% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 10GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.43 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A

CPU
A6-3420M APUAMDBench 36%, 4,510 samples	30x
A4-3305M APUAMDBench 31%, 1,486 samples	11x
A8-3520M APUAMD $60Bench 38%, 1,349 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 6520GAMDBench 2%, 8,067 samples	31x
Radeon HD 6480GAMDBench 2%, 5,005 samples	13x
Radeon HD 6620GAMDBench 3%, 3,311 samples	4x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
UD PRO 256GBGigabyte $49Bench 84%, 2,163 samples	2x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5273CM0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 479 samples	5x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	3x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16