Asrock 880GMH/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 880GMH/USB3  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '15 at 06:57
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 820
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 50.2
2-Core 100
34% 75.2 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 198
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 39% Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
EVGA(3842 3736) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.5306
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 3.69
4% 4.36 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 4.53
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.65 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 177
Write 113
Mixed 120
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 12.3
59% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 48.1
55% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
220GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 64.7
Mixed 34
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.36
107% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 60%
Typical 880GMH/USB3 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 880GMH/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback