Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Http://www.abit.com.tw/ FP-IN9 SLI(C55-MCP51) (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071217
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '17 at 20:10
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6750 9,456 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 28.5 2-Core 59.3 40% 56.5 Pts	4-Core 60.3 8-Core 60 8% 60.2 Pts	64-Core 60.9 4% 60.9 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX 3,983 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Nvidia(10DE 0577) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	7.8% Terrible	Lighting 10.7 Reflection 9.38 Parallax 3.62 9% 7.9 fps	MRender 8.62 Gravity 7.73 Splatting 6.22 6% 7.52 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.8% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.7% Below average	Read 131 Write 107 Mixed 118 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 13.3 70% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 22.8 DQ Write 39.9 DQ Mixed 13.3 15% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 104%
Seagate ST3500641AS 500GB-$76 1,952 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 422GB free Firmware: 3.AA Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 58.8 Write 55.5 Mixed 52.3 42% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.37 85% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB 3,111 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 123GB free Firmware: 21.0 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 56.7 Write 56 Mixed 60.1 44% 57.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.31 85% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 36%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 24GB free Firmware: 02.0 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 34.7 Write 38.9 Mixed 36.8 28% 36.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.38 96% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5.4 17% 5.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 5.3 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples	2x
Core2 Extreme Q6850IntelBench 47%, 1,078 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	1x
GeForce 6600NvidiaBench 0%, 968 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $342

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16