User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardRazer Razer
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170110
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 31 '17 at 19:22
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 195
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 598
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 6755) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7892
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.2% Poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 47.5
8% 23 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 47.9
Splatting 60.8
47% 56.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 2,099
Write 1,147
Mixed 1,390
341% 1,545 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 23.5
81% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 36.5
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 125
109% 153 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 186%
Great: 259%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HDZ-2G3B1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
73.2% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23.4
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 21.5
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback