Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba Qosmio X75-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	7.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '17 at 16:48
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 92.2 2-Core 163 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 367 33% 278 Pts	64-Core 83.3 5% 83.3 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FA77) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Lighting 3.63 Reflection 18.3 Parallax 6.09 3% 9.33 fps	MRender 7.62 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 7 5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GB-$167 1,242 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTTAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6814 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2096 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 191 191 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 73 (C2) HDA temperature 52 39 261994184752 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	50.2% Above average	Read 503 Write 85.1 Mixed 178 55% 255 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 18.9 77% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 46.6 DQ Mixed 56.9 37% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 92%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$117 2,938 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 704GB free Firmware: AUF01M Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2581 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4373 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 5733 (0A) Spinup retry count 187 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2062 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 14 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 11075724 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 11125 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 201864445979 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 74 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 179 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 21% Great: 76%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB 7,722 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 62GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 142 Write 38.1 Mixed 49.9 78% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.98 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.57 76% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GB 1,045 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.8% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.1 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio X75-A Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	72x
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	3x
Core i7-4702MQIntelBench 61%, 21,618 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	47x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	30x

SSD
HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GBToshiba $167Bench 71%, 1,242 samples	29x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	3x
M4 256GBCrucial $218Bench 61%, 17,938 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,045 samples	15x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples	8x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,054 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16