Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110426
Uptime	5.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '17 at 23:23
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 79 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 174 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 328 45% 335 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.3.2 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.6% Below average	Lighting 44.7 Reflection 64.3 Parallax 67.6 36% 58.9 fps	MRender 65.3 Gravity 1.07 Splatting 55 34% 40.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 70GB free Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10332 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3097 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 13 (AE) Unknown 100 100 552 (B5) Unknown 100 100 751621046420 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 142 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 105 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	34% Below average	Read 237 Write 136 Mixed 192 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 25.2 4K Mixed 4.86 41% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 97.4 DQ Mixed 4.6 31% 72 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 74%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7275 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1918 (B1) Unknown 99 99 19 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 63 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 34 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21594561050	69.8% Good	Read 502 Write 400 Mixed 412 97% 438 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 16.1 79% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 26.4 DQ Write 55.1 DQ Mixed 15.8 19% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 134%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 168 6483 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6109 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4389 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2042 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 45 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 184 184 49562 (C2) HDA temperature 125 116 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71.8% Very good	Read 128 Write 122 Mixed 120 93% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.18 95% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 28,220 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	48.7% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	582x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	159x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	75x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	41x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	36x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	50x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $728

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16