Asus A88X-GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A88X-GAMER (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160310
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '17 at 17:54
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 19,875 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 79.5 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 128 57% 92.4 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 213 28% 212 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.2.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	8.07% Terrible	Lighting 9.93 Reflection 8.96 Parallax 12.6 8% 10.5 fps	MRender 8.95 Gravity 9.13 Splatting 10.9 8% 9.65 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.07% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 15725 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1243 (B1) Unknown 91 91 100 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 49 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 141 (F1) Unknown 99 99 28704845662	80.3% Excellent	Read 444 Write 331 Mixed 327 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 22.5 112% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 61.5 86% 160 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 108%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 16GB 495 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID 5406 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	8.28% Terrible	Read 24.4 Write 12 Mixed 15.2 20% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.95 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.01 34% 2.99 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.28% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-2133C9-4GAB 8GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	47% Average	MC Read 21 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 19.5 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 13.4 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88X-GAMER Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus A88X-GAMER

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	16x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	11x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	8x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	4x

SSD
S3 1T00 1TBSandiskBench 95%, 12,396 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	6x
F3-2400C10-4GTX 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 188 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $290

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16