Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131030
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '17 at 17:36
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$42 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 89.7 2-Core 164 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 270 36% 270 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sapphire(174B E263) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.3.2 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.16% Terrible	Lighting 7.43 Reflection 8.92 Parallax 9.19 6% 8.51 fps	MRender 8.05 Gravity 6.33 Splatting 8.57 6% 7.65 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.16% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2889 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3076 (B1) Unknown 97 97 32 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 126 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14001580727	73.3% Very good	Read 495 Write 351 Mixed 336 87% 394 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 62.6 4K Mixed 13.5 105% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 29.8 DQ Write 63 DQ Mixed 10.8 18% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 793GB free Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 2992800 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4336 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4721210 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2854 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3085 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 63 17583767576 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 132 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 86 86 28348 (C2) HDA temperature 24 40 -140737488355304 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -84524956383603 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1710417958 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4503430638	108% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 187 Mixed 176 139% 185 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.36 102% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 27,024 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	53.3% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 16.9 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	132x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	96x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	58x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	57x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16