Asus F2A85-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F2A85-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130603
Uptime	11.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '17 at 03:47
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135 10,478 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 54.2 1-Core 59.3 2-Core 106 44% 73.1 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 182 24% 181 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D 10,029 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8526) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	4.25% Terrible	Lighting 5.07 Reflection 7.27 Parallax 4.59 4% 5.64 fps	MRender 4.48 Gravity 3.97 Splatting 7.26 4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.25% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 26174 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 79 (B1) Unknown 90 90 119 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 45 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 35 (F1) Unknown 99 99 27003824800	70.8% Very good	Read 412 Write 322 Mixed 317 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 19.1 100% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 81.6 DQ Mixed 47.2 54% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 22GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 132059134 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4965 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 109142144 (09) Power-on hours count 46 46 47534 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 290 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 94 118 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 50 706347046 (C2) HDA temperature 38 50 60129542182 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 33 15 132059134 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 105883828783714 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3370519760 (F2) Unknown 100 253 193253349	52.8% Above average	Read 92.6 Write 91.3 Mixed 89.8 69% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.63 133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBRL F3-12800CL9-2GBRL Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 10.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.4 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A85-M PRO Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M PRO

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	13x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	12x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	12x

GPU
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	5x

SSD
SQ500S37480G 480GBKingstonBench 77%, 1,176 samples	3x
S3 512G 512GBSandiskBench 96%, 10,855 samples	3x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	2x

RAM
KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 41%, 1,116 samples	5x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	3x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $88

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16