Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M EVO (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '17 at 00:28
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$170 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 90 2-Core 175 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 225 30% 224 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 844D) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.96 Parallax 1.31 1% 1.59 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.74 2% 2.06 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8334 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 690 (B1) Unknown 96 96 43 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 1 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 51 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 83 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20774638073	80.7% Excellent	Read 507 Write 350 Mixed 330 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 35.6 4K Mixed 21.6 102% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 70 86% 152 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 118%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 344GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 76 76 7980 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4190 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 10364 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13104 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1487 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 6 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 57 353304597 (C2) HDA temperature 72 55 470745116 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 39923 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	37.5% Below average	Read 70.8 Write 59.6 Mixed 39.6 42% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.38 92% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 62%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 343GB free Firmware: 1AA01112 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 85 85 5270 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4113 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13858 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1600 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 12 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 66 353370133 (C2) HDA temperature 73 66 454033435 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 3855 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	43.5% Average	Read 73.9 Write 77.2 Mixed 66.9 54% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 2.39 4K Mixed 0.42 110% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 59%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB 281 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 892GB free, PID ab34 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 141 Write 139 Mixed 96.4 158% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.24 65% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 72%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB 4,635 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 23GB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 78.9 Write 77.6 Mixed 37.3 79% 64.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 0.38 4K Mixed 0.17 20% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 34,385 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	52.6% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	69x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	38x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	34x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	38x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 20,728 samples	8x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	6x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 3x2GBSamsungBench 33%, 184 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16