Cyclone Intel DQ35JO BIOS 669

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Cyclone Intel DQ35JO BIOS 669 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ35JO
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070726
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '17 at 04:13
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170 24,176 User benchmarks, average bench 46% J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	42.3% Average	Memory 73.4 1-Core 28 2-Core 48.3 36% 49.9 Pts	4-Core 65.6 8-Core 86.4 10% 76 Pts	64-Core 91.8 6% 91.8 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7900 GS 538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 0662) 256MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 0.5 2% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 109 4347144004 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 -19439021973747 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1129 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 116 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 27 65 34363998235 (C2) HDA temperature 27 65 34363998235 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4347144004 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4347144004 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4347144004 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15401 (EA) Unknown 0 0 20742 (F1) Unknown 0 0 20742 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5048	31.6% Below average	Read 134 Write 86 Mixed 88.8 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 55.1 4K Mixed 10 64% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23 DQ Write 83 DQ Mixed 7.28 19% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 73%
Maxtor 7L250S0 250GB-$91 574 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 124GB free Firmware: BANC1G10 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 186 181 25286 (04) Start/Stop count 253 253 941 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 249 244 54830 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 15105 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 252 252 564 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 29 253 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 2557 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 199 0 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 252 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 252 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 240 240 166 (D2) Unknown 253 252 0 (D3) Unknown 253 252 0 (D4) Unknown 253 252 0	31.4% Below average	Read 49.1 Write 58.6 Mixed 53.2 40% 53.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 5.38 4K Mixed 0.21 144% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 36%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 47GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 78 56005991 (03) Spinup time 91 89 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4658 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 59 214011154 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 27600 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1854 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 44 471531548 (C2) HDA temperature 28 56 47244640284 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 66 56 79018093 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	30.7% Below average	Read 52.4 Write 54.4 Mixed 19.6 31% 42.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.34 74% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.6 17% 5.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 6.4 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Cyclone Intel DQ35JO BIOS 669

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)