Alienware Aurora

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0H869M
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '17 at 17:02
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 95.2
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 158
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 362
40% 312 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
AMD(1002 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 25.2
22% 22.5 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 19.1
15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AN10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 86.1
Write 106
Mixed 58.1
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.27
59% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
731GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 94
Write 111
Mixed 102
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.44
102% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
293GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 81.4
Write 68.7
Mixed 61
53% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.34
98% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 69%
WD WD1500ADFD-00NLR1 150GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20.07P20 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 54
Write 58.6
Mixed 51.1
41% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 47%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB
30GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
8.41% Terrible
Read 21
Write 5.36
Mixed 8.14
12% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.72
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 1.22
92% 2.01 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.41%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 19.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Aurora

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $249
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback