Toshiba SATELLITE C50D-A-10M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C50D-A-10M (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD PT10ABX
Memory	2.6 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '17 at 15:25
Run Duration	309 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1200 APU 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	19% Very poor	Memory 33.7 1-Core 16.7 2-Core 20.1 17% 23.5 Pts	4-Core 26.6 8-Core 28.6 4% 27.6 Pts	64-Core 29.8 2% 29.8 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310 7,882 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FA30) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.87% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.24 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.09 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.87% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 763GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2BA30003 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 14 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 93 89 2225 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 574 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1374 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 38 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 514 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 3121 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 49 (C2) HDA temperature 64 50 214748889116 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 3761 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 38 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 53339	48.4% Average	Read 84.2 Write 84.1 Mixed 81.9 63% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.32 88% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB 6,219 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 9GB free, PID 556b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	7.18% Terrible	Read 22.6 Write 8.16 Mixed 6.05 13% 12.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.57 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.7 52% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.18% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT112S6TFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 5GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 1333, 1600 MHz 1024, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.71% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 4 10% 3.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 2.4 6% 1.93 GB/s	Latency 234 17% 234 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.71% Great: 10%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba SATELLITE C50D-A-10M

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)