Asus P5Q

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '17 at 14:03
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170 24,176 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 38.3 2-Core 76.6 40% 61.2 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 144 20% 146 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 16.1 Parallax 17.2 16% 17.8 fps	MRender 23.5 Gravity 19.8 Splatting 17 16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3090 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1098 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 34 (AE) Unknown 100 100 22 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 52 206159609887 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 7085294177 (F7) Unknown 100 100 224791875 (F8) Unknown 100 100 354980717	47.9% Average	Read 190 Write 220 Mixed 179 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 17.7 85% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 22.8 DQ Write 47.6 DQ Mixed 14.3 17% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 2360 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4698 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 4547820064 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15648 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3076 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4295032990 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 52 471269403 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 91 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 5140 (C2) HDA temperature 27 48 77309411355 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 23 11 2360 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -104668352994624 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2058531301 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3512297390	66% Good	Read 111 Write 119 Mixed 115 87% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.48 92% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 75%
Samsung SP1604N 160GB-$43 320 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 149GB free Firmware: TM100-24 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 14 (03) Spinup time 65 54 5952 (04) Start/Stop count 84 84 16838 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 2493078 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6677 (C2) HDA temperature 142 100 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 373683881 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0	32.9% Below average	Read 55.6 Write 58.8 Mixed 33.1 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.41 90% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 32%
Maxtor STM3200820AS 200GB 277 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 5GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 82 155038200 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 11149 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 446834002 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15476 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5229 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 49 505217054 (C2) HDA temperature 30 51 64424509470 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 78 63 158379395 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 40 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	21.8% Poor	Read 38.4 Write 37.2 Mixed 19.7 23% 31.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.4 86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 6.4 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	75x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	56x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	38x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	23x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	21x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	10x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	194x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	90x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16