Gigabyte GA-870A-USB3L

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-870A-USB3L (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '17 at 13:08
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 84.2 1-Core 45.3 2-Core 88.1 48% 72.5 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 238 24% 197 Pts	64-Core 233 14% 233 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6970 9,594 User benchmarks, average bench 20% PwrHis(1787 2306) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Lighting 28.5 Reflection 24.4 Parallax 27.5 23% 26.8 fps	MRender 22 Gravity 26 Splatting 29.7 22% 25.9 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 201820079 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 46377056875611 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1103 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 89 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 39 51542163487 (C2) HDA temperature 31 39 51542163487 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 201820079 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 201820079 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 201820079 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 21474836480 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10057 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6150 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6150 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11486	25.9% Poor	Read 153 Write 62.3 Mixed 74.4 21% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 6.13 49% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 13.5 DQ Write 78.1 DQ Mixed 5.67 16% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 223GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 169 2483 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5955 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13457 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1100 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 89 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5876 (C2) HDA temperature 112 99 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	75.8% Very good	Read 133 Write 131 Mixed 94.1 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.51 4K Mixed 0.36 115% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 93GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 65977770 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6695 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 26011101271 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14432 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2728 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 27 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 57 572588065 (C2) HDA temperature 33 43 21474836513 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 48 24 65977770 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 67435281537660 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1153647013 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2203348273	56.3% Above average	Read 101 Write 95 Mixed 65.7 65% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.34 86% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.7% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 11.9 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 9.1 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-870A-USB3L Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-870A-USB3L

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	6x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	6x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	4x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	2x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $242

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16