Asus Z87-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z87-PRO  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMar 26 '17 at 08:34
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 215
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 580
62% 494 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 41.2
41% 45.8 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 37.5
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
94GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 337
Mixed 344
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 25.5
127% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 74.8
112% 213 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 496
Write 192
Mixed 269
70% 319 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 21.2
107% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 73.4
90% 163 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 116%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 160
Mixed 129
117% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.77
4K Mixed 0.27
114% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 98%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 119
Write 123
Mixed 111
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.19
88% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
765GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 92.6
Write 92.1
Mixed 75.5
65% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.28
103% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 87%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 38.4
Mixed 36
48% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.23
45% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 21%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
60GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42% Average
Read 142
Write 75.1
Mixed 92.9
121% 103 MB/s
4K Read 8.22
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.91
95% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 16.7
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-PRO Builds (Compare 2,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z87-PRO - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $454
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback