| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131111 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 25 '17 at 09:13 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54.7%
Above average
|
54% 88.8 Pts
|
30% 232 Pts
|
18% 299 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
Gigabyte(1458 22D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1290 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48%
Average
|
48% 67.4 fps
|
47% 58.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
31.6%
Below average
|
23% 104 MB/s
|
65% 26.9 MB/s
|
20% 38.7 MB/s
|
|
|
75.6%
Very good
|
94% 125 MB/s
|
104% 1.09 MB/s
| |
|
|
69%
Good
|
82% 109 MB/s
|
117% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.8%
Poor
|
30% 10.3 GB/s
|
20% 7.1 GB/s
|
42% 95.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 127x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 73x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 59x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 24x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $396 |