Xxxxxx Satellite P200

Performance Results


Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 5% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Xxxxxx Satellite P200 (all builds)
Motherboard	XXXXXX ISRAA
Memory	0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '17 at 08:17
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7800 236 User benchmarks, average bench 36% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Memory 36.2 1-Core 12.5 2-Core 24.8 18% 24.5 Pts	4-Core 25.8 8-Core 25.8 3% 25.8 Pts	64-Core 25.9 2% 25.9 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 487 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FF01) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.54% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 3.23 Parallax 0.84 2% 1.98 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 2.78 2% 1.82 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.54% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5199612 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13469017441800 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 232 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 12 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 44 85902229532 (C2) HDA temperature 28 44 85902229532 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5199612 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5199612 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5199612 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1100 (EA) Unknown 0 0 753 (F1) Unknown 0 0 753 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1024 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2490390	31.5% Below average	Read 233 Write 110 Mixed 151 36% 165 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 9.98 43% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 60.5 DQ Write 45.1 DQ Mixed 27.9 28% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x1GB 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 1GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	5.53% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.83 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.1 SC Mixed 0.1 0% 0.1 GB/s	Latency 221 18% 221 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.53% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite P200 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Xxxxxx Satellite P200

CPU
Core2 Duo T7100Intel $99Bench 33%, 1,343 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 2600ATIBench 1%, 487 samples	1x

SSD
S3 250G 250GBSandiskBench 87%, 1,221 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $99

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16