Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	64% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160804
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '17 at 06:09
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Memory 87.8 1-Core 119 2-Core 213 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 800 80% 652 Pts	64-Core 1,027 64% 1,027 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB; galaxy gtx1060 6gb CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64% Good	Lighting 81.4 Reflection 80.3 Parallax 68.3 66% 76.7 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 73.5 Splatting 73.3 60% 72.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 267GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3187 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1850 (B1) Unknown 98 98 22 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 23 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 169 (F1) Unknown 99 99 26711061984	86.4% Excellent	Read 503 Write 404 Mixed 418 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 28.4 95% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 228 DQ Mixed 100 122% 217 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 131%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42 16,792 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 204GB free Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 929 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 391 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 17 (AE) Unknown 100 100 224 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 38 266289086503 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 4476792418 (F7) Unknown 100 100 140434619 (F8) Unknown 100 100 50382610 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1268 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	63.1% Good	Read 472 Write 331 Mixed 335 84% 379 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 26.4 4K Mixed 17.4 62% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.1 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 36.2 49% 84.3 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 95%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4952 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2392 (B1) Unknown 93 93 69 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 52 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 3 (EB) Unknown 99 1 389 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16547407634	57.9% Above average	Read 487 Write 187 Mixed 135 58% 270 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 11.2 80% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.9 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 26.2 40% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 85%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70 66,332 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 518GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 219333936 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 643 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 3357670 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 932 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 396 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 90 90 10 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 66 58 571867170 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 96 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2069 (C2) HDA temperature 34 42 34 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -53764400610801 (F1) Unknown 100 253 8442822126 (F2) Unknown 100 253 86706208997	70.7% Very good	Read 102 Write 144 Mixed 85.3 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 5.35 4K Mixed 0.5 177% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 2,270 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 42.4 MC Mixed 33.2 106% 37.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 18.6 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	154x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	100x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	55x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	41x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	19x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x

RAM
CL15-15-15 D4-2133 2x8GBUnknownBench 68%, 1,169 samples	12x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 78%, 415 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 121% - Outstanding

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16