Asus CM1855

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus CM1855 (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130820
Uptime	8.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '17 at 01:29
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 59.2 2-Core 119 55% 87.5 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 328 34% 273 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Sapphire(174B 2015) CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Lighting 28.1 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 33.3 23% 30.5 fps	MRender 27.1 Gravity 22.4 Splatting 35.4 24% 28.3 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 480GB-$195 707 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6185 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 583 (AB) Unknown 100 100 157501776 (AE) Unknown 100 100 19 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 108 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 97 97 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6436 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4354 (F9) Unknown 100 100 263717425	68.2% Good	Read 450 Write 355 Mixed 423 91% 409 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 55.7 4K Mixed 12.8 78% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 15.9 43% 92.7 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 834GB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 229443872 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2510 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 4574236899 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 9708 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1720 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 49 639565862 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 136 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 13909 (C2) HDA temperature 38 51 73014444070 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 6442450951040 (F1) Unknown 100 253 -121893274581975 (F2) Unknown 100 253 -96852143597604	103% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 181 Mixed 167 132% 175 MB/s	4K Read 1.21 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.48 131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC SLA302G08-GGNHC SLZ302G08-GGNHC 10GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11.5 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 10.6 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM1855 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CM1855

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	17x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	10x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	5x

GPU
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	6x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	2x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	4x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	3x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S Corsair CML16GX3M2A1600C10 16GBAdataBench 25%, 4 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16