Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	66.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '17 at 18:48
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Memory 94.8 1-Core 112 2-Core 214 81% 140 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 908 82% 693 Pts	64-Core 1,278 79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Z (SLI Disabled) 571 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 84C7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	66.7% Good	Lighting 93.9 Reflection 59.9 Parallax 73.3 76% 75.7 fps	MRender 74.6 Gravity 60.1 Splatting 46.1 48% 60.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 75%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 810GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 24097 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 260 (B1) Unknown 98 98 19 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 42 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 97 (F1) Unknown 99 99 54604715788	81.8% Excellent	Read 496 Write 311 Mixed 357 86% 388 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 25.8 110% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 94.6 105% 181 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 126%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 235 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 119 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 60 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 5 (F1) Unknown 99 99 890080885	81.3% Excellent	Read 478 Write 252 Mixed 267 73% 332 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 27.7 115% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 69.8 106% 205 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 123%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 989GB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 76021440 (03) Spinup time 92 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1473 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 28294452 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15701 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 217 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 50 404226072 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 67 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 22864 (C2) HDA temperature 24 50 17179869208 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 109641925135867 (F1) Unknown 100 253 13493758161 (F2) Unknown 100 253 38512615847	46.6% Average	Read 92.1 Write 70.5 Mixed 80.8 61% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.37 4K Mixed 0.2 43% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 96%
WD Elements 1078 1.5TB 333 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 832GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 72.3 Write 68.1 Mixed 35.4 71% 58.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.35 4K Mixed 0.19 20% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 772 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 164GB free, PID ce17 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 39.4 Write 41.1 Mixed 30.9 47% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.44 62% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB 10,048 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	87% Excellent	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 28.8 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 21.8 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 57.8 69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX X99 GAMING Builds (Compare 1,328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING - $300

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	522x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	256x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	242x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	282x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	173x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	154x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	41x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	41x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	20x
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 3,272 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $912

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16