Acer Aspire 7552G

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Aspire 7552G (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire 7552G
Memory	0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101026
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '17 at 14:14
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X920 Quad-Core 23 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 63.9 1-Core 33.3 2-Core 66.2 36% 54.5 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 125 17% 125 Pts	64-Core 127 8% 127 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5850 1,228 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Acer(1025 0442) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	5.8% Terrible	Lighting 7.7 Reflection 5.69 Parallax 6.84 6% 6.75 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 5.93 Splatting 6.26 5% 5.89 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.8% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB 5,433 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM71.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 109 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 47 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 91 91 74 (AD) Unknown 100 100 131079 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 279	36.1% Below average	Read 248 Write 192 Mixed 237 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 5.88 41% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 11 DQ Mixed 8.05 19% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 97%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2009)-$152 5,563 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 275GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3862 (03) Spinup time 154 147 3300 (04) Start/Stop count 1 1 171221 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13702 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3799 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 5876 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 185 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 1627588 (C2) HDA temperature 110 84 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	33.1% Below average	Read 56.8 Write 58.2 Mixed 16.9 32% 44 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.32 79% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5673FH0-CH9 4GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 6.1 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Acer Aspire 7552G

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)