Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '17 at 08:26
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600-$89 39,689 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 111 2-Core 231 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 371 49% 369 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.8% Good	Lighting 77.1 Reflection 78.3 Parallax 72 63% 75.8 fps	MRender 77.2 Gravity 70.7 Splatting 63.3 57% 70.4 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 18246735 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 118515327571866 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1413 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 605 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 49 64427720730 (C2) HDA temperature 26 49 64427720730 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 18246735 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 18246735 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 18246735 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13491 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11158 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11158 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8718	48.4% Average	Read 390 Write 93.3 Mixed 145 45% 210 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 83.6 4K Mixed 10.1 85% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 23 30% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 333GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 174 2275 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1639 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6055 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 870 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 61 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1577 (C2) HDA temperature 117 99 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	88.3% Excellent	Read 169 Write 139 Mixed 130 109% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.27 88% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB 49,673 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65% Good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 20.6 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 18.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS - $110

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	294x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	211x
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	133x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	129x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	121x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	90x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	48x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	32x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16