Asus P6T SE

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6T SE (all builds)
Memory	15.6 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100224
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '17 at 23:43
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 930-$199 19,497 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 74.6 2-Core 149 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 297 40% 297 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E258) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Lighting 24.1 Reflection 26.5 Parallax 27.7 20% 26.1 fps	MRender 26.2 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 31 22% 26.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1225 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 532 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 53 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6110191224	45.8% Average	Read 196 Write 181 Mixed 168 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 18 84% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 31.2 DQ Write 48.2 DQ Mixed 18 20% 32.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 148GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 203 162 4833 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4080 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5130 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2255 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 216 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 186 186 43688 (C2) HDA temperature 128 103 22 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 4	42.5% Average	Read 67 Write 80.8 Mixed 80.1 57% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.15 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 67%
Toshiba MK6465GSX 640GB 4,539 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 50GB free Firmware: GJ002J Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 98 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2161 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 5978 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 986 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 6128 (0A) Spinup retry count 219 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5065 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 15 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 99 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 19109 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 227634053143 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 744 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8227 (DE) Loaded hours 90 90 4305 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 384 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	27.6% Poor	Read 47.3 Write 48.6 Mixed 17 28% 37.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.34 87% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 48%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 139 3975 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3369 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6063 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2735 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 292 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3076 (C2) HDA temperature 120 88 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.1% Below average	Read 63.7 Write 58.4 Mixed 25.5 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.28 88% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 18GB 8,131 User benchmarks, average bench 42% null MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 16.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 11.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T SE Builds (Compare 1,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6T SE

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	507x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	225x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	190x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	70x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	35x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	212x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	139x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16