Illegear Q5 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIllegear Q5 EVO  (all builds)
MotherboardILLEGEAR ILLEGEAR Q5 EVO
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170213
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 23 '17 at 16:37
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 550
57% 458 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 102E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4541
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 5.41
5% 14.7 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 5.07
Splatting 11.7
7% 8.05 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
387GB free
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 463
Write 323
Mixed 329
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 22.3
103% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 28.2
74% 157 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 99%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 167
Write 165
Mixed 436
58% 256 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 21
140% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 52.9
89% 166 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 107%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB
381GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 39.4
Mixed 37.8
50% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.37
81% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 44%
Imation Nano Pro 16GB
5GB free, PID 063a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 12.1
Mixed 11.2
17% 15 MB/s
4K Read 4.62
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.18
24% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.3% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.4
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q5 EVO Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Illegear Q5 EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $47
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback