Gateway E4076

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gateway E4076 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel D102GGC2
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070130
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '17 at 15:57
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	96%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.06GHz-$120 856 User benchmarks, average bench 25% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	26.8% Poor	Memory 48.3 1-Core 16 2-Core 33.6 24% 32.6 Pts	4-Core 33.5 8-Core 33.6 4% 33.5 Pts	64-Core 33.5 2% 33.5 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400 10,400 User benchmarks, average bench 1% PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.09% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 1.69 Parallax 1.59 1% 1.54 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.52 1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.09% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 104GB free Firmware: CR100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 1 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7680 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9957 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4721 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2240 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 52 36 (C2) HDA temperature 130 94 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 137265 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	37.1% Below average	Read 59.4 Write 69.8 Mixed 54.9 46% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.3 71% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 44%
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43 2,329 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.06 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 63 51 134985301 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 49 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 552429665 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 21939 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3014 (C2) HDA temperature 39 50 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 63 51 134985301 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 188 12 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	23.6% Poor	Read 42.1 Write 40.3 Mixed 39.2 30% 40.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.16 4K Write 0.36 4K Mixed 0.17 32% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 30%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 27GB free Firmware: CR100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7808 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8238 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5362 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2620 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 51 28 (C2) HDA temperature 154 91 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 25277156 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	33% Below average	Read 57.1 Write 57.8 Mixed 61.1 44% 58.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.35 85% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 1.7 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1.8 6% 2.13 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gateway E4076

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)