Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '17 at 14:55
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 352
46% 349 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 39.3
28% 35 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 35.6
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
633GB free
Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 481
Write 329
Mixed 334
84% 382 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 23.3
89% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 50.8
95% 193 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 104%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM01B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 501
Write 224
Mixed 319
77% 348 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 16.3
73% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 75.4
DQ Mixed 55.1
73% 137 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 152
Write 161
Mixed 148
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.25
114% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 101%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 97.1
Mixed 87.6
71% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.16
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 63%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
828GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 96.5
Write 68
Mixed 78.1
61% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.34
86% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $572
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback