PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140403 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 23 '17 at 12:16 |
Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 34% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.6%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SHFS37A240G 240GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
62.1%
Good
|
|||
99.3%
Outstanding
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
|
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 379x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 82x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 44x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 43x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 29x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $729 |