| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 9.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock 960GC-GS FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 3 GB |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131002 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 23 '17 at 11:01 |
| Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
|
34.7%
Below average
|
36% 57.3 Pts
|
10% 75.7 Pts
|
4% 69.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
MSI(1462 2368) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.78
|
9.51%
Terrible
|
9% 10.9 fps
|
11% 13.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
|
Hitachi HTS725025A9A364 250GB-$79
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PC2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
43.7%
Average
|
56% 74.7 MB/s
|
56% 0.48 MB/s
| |
|
|
30.5%
Below average
|
40% 53.5 MB/s
|
102% 0.94 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3GB
52217, 52217 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
11.2%
Very poor
|
10% 3.47 GB/s
|
7% 2.47 GB/s
|
29% 137 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 30x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 13x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $197 |