| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| Motherboard | Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8 |
| BIOS Date | 20120929 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 23 '17 at 03:52 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
32.9%
Below average
|
34% 52 Pts
|
9% 66.7 Pts
|
4% 69.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6410D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.97.10.6
|
2.05%
Terrible
|
2% 2.41 fps
|
2% 2.69 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
36%
Below average
|
37% 169 MB/s
|
49% 15.7 MB/s
|
34% 62.8 MB/s
|
|
|
62.4%
Good
|
80% 107 MB/s
|
87% 0.78 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905595-011.A00LF 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.2%
Poor
|
24% 8.23 GB/s
|
15% 5.4 GB/s
|
28% 143 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical F1A55-M LK R2.0 Builds (Compare 16 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples | 7x |
| A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples | 4x |
| Athlon II X4 651AMDBench 50%, 1,008 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 3x |
| HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 2x |
| Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $369 |